<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tech-Lead on jdcsen</title><link>https://jdcsen.com/tags/tech-lead/</link><description>Recent content in Tech-Lead on jdcsen</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://jdcsen.com/tags/tech-lead/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Paralinguistic Signals from a Speech LLM</title><link>https://jdcsen.com/projects/paralinguistic-features/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jdcsen.com/projects/paralinguistic-features/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;NVIDIA Triton Python backend fronting a vLLM-served speech LLM, taken from prototype to production.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Derives confidence, sentiment and spoken-language ID from the model&amp;rsquo;s own token-level outputs. No additional models to train or serve.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Orchestrates per-signal LLM queries over gRPC alongside ONNX Runtime inference for confidence calibration and forced alignment.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;p50 latency of approximately 5 to 10 ms per signal.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Technical lead for a three-engineer team. A later &lt;a href="https://jdcsen.com/projects/triton-throughput-refactor/"&gt;concurrency refactor&lt;/a&gt; took sustained throughput from roughly 8 to 80 requests per second.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>RAG Personalization for Speech Recognition</title><link>https://jdcsen.com/projects/rag-asr-personalization/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jdcsen.com/projects/rag-asr-personalization/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Retrieval-augmented personalization for the same speech LLM behind the &lt;a href="https://jdcsen.com/projects/paralinguistic-features/"&gt;paralinguistic backend&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A user&amp;rsquo;s contacts, device names and music library are retrieved from their catalogs with approximate-nearest-neighbor search.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Retrieved entries are injected into the LLM&amp;rsquo;s prefill context, so the model transcribes the user&amp;rsquo;s own vocabulary instead of guessing at it.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The original design needed three round trips through the LLM per request. Working with the applied science team, we replaced LLM-generated query embeddings with an index keyed on voice features, eliminating one of them, a roughly 20 ms LLM round trip per request.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Keying retrieval on voice features also decoupled the lookup from the LLM&amp;rsquo;s context request, so retrieval runs speculatively, in parallel with the model, instead of waiting on it.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Led the effort end to end, from retrieval design to serving.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Triton Backend Throughput Refactor</title><link>https://jdcsen.com/projects/triton-throughput-refactor/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:45 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jdcsen.com/projects/triton-throughput-refactor/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Load testing showed latency growing linearly with concurrency: the server was serializing, capping throughput at about 8 requests per second.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Three structural fixes: parallelize independent ONNX inference calls, replace a reference-counted five-thread dispatcher with single-threaded cooperative multitasking, and run several independent backend instances.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Latency curve went from linear to roughly square-root in concurrency; sustained throughput reached 64 to 80 requests per second on the same hardware, an 8 to 10x improvement.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Single-request latency barely moved (about 90 to 70 ms). This was a contention fix, not a per-request speedup.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Safety-Critical Power Control for a Fielded RF Front End</title><link>https://jdcsen.com/projects/rf-power-control/</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:33:39 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://jdcsen.com/projects/rf-power-control/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A new L3Harris radio needed far more output dynamic range than the fielded RF front end it had to work with was designed to give.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The front end&amp;rsquo;s transmit chain had two gain stages: a coarse driver with three setpoints (low, medium, high) and a downstream fine stage adjustable in dB. The radio commanded a single power level. I designed and implemented the control software that turns that level into a safe setpoint pair for both stages.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Reaching the required range meant disabling the equipment&amp;rsquo;s built-in protection interlocks, so the software became the only thing standing between a command and hardware damage. Both stages maxed, or either past its limit, could destroy the amplifier and drop a pilot&amp;rsquo;s radio link.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Acted as de-facto software lead: direction for a small team, and project status reporting to organization management.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>